Return to the introductory guide
Groups, development, trauma, culture and sexuality · Chapter 59
Bucci, Panksepp, Solms and Schore: linking feeling, bodies and words without reducing one to another
The complete text is available below. Search, saving resources, and partner-practice tools require JavaScript.
Chapter contents
The old problem in a new vocabulary
Psychoanalysis began in conversation with medicine and neurology. Later developments ask whether findings about memory, emotion and the brain can refine its accounts of unconscious life and therapeutic change. The opportunity is real, but so is the temptation to borrow neuroscientific language as a certificate of truth. A familiar clinical idea does not become established merely because it is described as neural regulation. [257]
In plain English: all therapy involves brains. That fact does not tell us which interpretation is right or which treatment this person needs.
Bucci: experience has more than one code
Wilma Bucci's multiple code theory distinguishes subsymbolic processing, nonverbal symbolic processing and verbal symbolic processing. Subsymbolic experience can involve continuous sensory, bodily and affective patterns that are not yet discrete images or words. The referential process concerns connections among these formats. Bernard Maskit, Rachele Mariani and colleagues helped develop ways to study aspects of this process in language. [171] [171]
In plain English: a person can have an experience in the body without a clear picture, find a picture before finding words, and use words without contacting the experience they supposedly describe.
This provides a way to understand why an emotionally specific scene may help more than a general explanation. It also warns against treating verbal fluency as the same thing as integration. A patient can speak elegantly about attachment while remaining disconnected from the feeling of asking for company.
The research measures are not a machine that reads unconscious truth. They identify patterns relevant to a theory. Changes in language must be interpreted with clinical context, and no language score can replace the patient's account or demonstrate historical accuracy.
Original fictional scene: from abstraction to something lived
Elena says, “I have a problem with dependency.” She has used the phrase many times without knowing what to do with it.
Therapist: Could we find one moment this week when that phrase became relevant?
Elena: I stood outside my friend's apartment with soup. I hoped she would ask me to stay.
Therapist: What do you notice as you picture waiting there?
Elena: The bag was warm in my hand. I wanted to say I was lonely, but I talked about her cold instead.
The scene connects a bodily detail, an image, a wish and language. The therapist does not announce a completed referential cycle. Elena now has something more particular to explore: caring for someone can also be an indirect request for care. That understanding may change an actual conversation later.
What changed in practice: the therapist listens for the relationship between words and experience rather than merely the correctness of the words. A plain description can be more useful than adding a technical explanation.
Panksepp and Solms: affect and motivation
Jaak Panksepp's affective neuroscience studied basic emotional systems across species. Mark Solms's neuropsychoanalytic work brings neurological and psychoanalytic observations into dialogue, including arguments about affect, consciousness, dreaming and unconscious learning. These contributions matter because they ask psychoanalysis to engage with biological findings rather than remain a self-contained interpretive language. [259] [257] [258]
In plain English: feeling is not just decoration attached to thought. It can organize what matters, what is sought and what is avoided.
Solms's particular accounts are theoretical proposals supported and contested through scientific work. The presence of unconscious processing in neuroscience does not confirm every Freudian account of repression, infant fantasy or drives. Likewise, a debate about consciousness does not decide whether an individual therapist should interpret a client's dream in one way.
Schore and regulation
Allan Schore emphasizes developmental affect regulation and nonverbal communication. His synthesis influenced clinicians interested in the emotional atmosphere of the encounter and implicit learning. It belongs beside infant researchers such as Stern, Beebe and Tronick, not in place of their different methods and findings. “Right-brain to right-brain” language is a theoretical shorthand, not an observation a therapist can directly establish from a warm exchange. [269]
In plain English: pace, voice and timing can matter even when nobody states their meaning. They still do not give the clinician privileged access to another person's mind.
What not to smuggle into the room
A patient can have a bodily symptom with psychological associations and also a medical condition. A change in breathing does not diagnose a trauma response. A striking feeling in the therapist does not establish a transferred state. An account of memory reconsolidation does not prove that a particular insight rewrote a memory. Clinical observation, model explanation and mechanism evidence must stay distinct.
These boundaries do not make embodied work unimportant. They make it more exact. The clinician can ask whether attention to the body helps this person, accept a preference for ordinary conversation, and assess symptoms appropriately.
A continuing research conversation
A 2026 special-issue introduction by Bucci and Henry Peterson provides a dated sign of continuing work on multiple code theory and the referential process. It is an editorial contribution, not a new trial of the entire theory. Including the publication shows how the field continues to refine its questions without claiming that “current” means settled. [171]
Study task: give three versions of Elena's experience: a bodily description, an image, and a verbal generalization. Show what each reveals and misses. Then write an explanation of therapeutic change without using the words brain, neural or rewiring. If the clinical account disappears, the neuroscience language may have been doing more persuasion than explanation.
Source and reading notes
Independent educational synthesis. Fictional conversations illustrate reasoning. Review scopes describe the material consulted; they do not certify all clinical claims.
The case for neuropsychoanalysis: Why a dialogue with neuroscience is necessary but not sufficient for psychoanalysis (opens in a new tab)
Abstract checked
Abstract or official summary reviewed. Full paper not appraised.
Primary theoretical-review abstract inspected; not proof that neuroscience validates a particular school or individual inference.
Recorded check: 2026-10-16. Source used for this record (opens in a new tab)
Pathway source review: checked at stated scope
abstract: Primary theoretical-review abstract inspected; not proof that neuroscience validates a particular school or individual inference.
checked at stated scope · Recorded date: 2026-10-16
Scope concerns what was consulted; it is not approval of every claim or author endorsement.
Further reading for psychodynamic history, theory and practice.
Access depends on the destination; saving a link does not unlock paid material.
Introduction to the Issue: Advances in Theory and Research on Multiple Code Theory and the Referential Process (opens in a new tab)
Review scope recorded
See the pathway review note for the exact material consulted.
Issue introduction, not a trial. Describes multiple-code theory, referential process, and computerized language measures; conference occurred in July 2023.
Recorded check: 2026-10-16. Source used for this record (opens in a new tab)
Pathway source review: checked at stated scope
abstract-and-publisher-record: Issue introduction, not a trial. Describes multiple-code theory, referential process, and computerized language measures; conference occurred in July 2023.
checked at stated scope · Recorded date: 2026-10-16
Scope concerns what was consulted; it is not approval of every claim or author endorsement.
Further reading for psychodynamic history, theory and practice.
Access depends on the destination; saving a link does not unlock paid material.
Affective Neuroscience: The Foundations of Human and Animal Emotions (opens in a new tab)
Review scope recorded
See the pathway review note for the exact material consulted.
Primary authored book abstract checked; underlying experiments and species-to-clinic extrapolations not separately reviewed.
Recorded check: 2026-10-16. Source used for this record (opens in a new tab)
Pathway source review: checked at stated scope
publisher-abstract: Primary authored book abstract checked; underlying experiments and species-to-clinic extrapolations not separately reviewed.
checked at stated scope · Recorded date: 2026-10-16
Scope concerns what was consulted; it is not approval of every claim or author endorsement.
Further reading for psychodynamic history, theory and practice.
Access depends on the destination; saving a link does not unlock paid material.
A neuropsychoanalytical approach to the hard problem of consciousness (opens in a new tab)
Abstract checked
Abstract or official summary reviewed. Full paper not appraised.
Author theoretical perspective; abstract read. Not consensus neuroscience or a treatment-outcome trial.
Recorded check: 2026-10-16. Source used for this record (opens in a new tab)
Pathway source review: checked at stated scope
abstract: Author theoretical perspective; abstract read. Not consensus neuroscience or a treatment-outcome trial.
checked at stated scope · Recorded date: 2026-10-16
Scope concerns what was consulted; it is not approval of every claim or author endorsement.
Further reading for psychodynamic history, theory and practice.
Access depends on the destination; saving a link does not unlock paid material.
Affect Regulation and the Origin of the Self: The Neurobiology of Emotional Development (opens in a new tab)
Review scope recorded
See the pathway review note for the exact material consulted.
Publisher record and description; full neuroscience claims not independently appraised. A clinical synthesis does not verify every proposed brain mechanism.
Recorded check: 2026-10-16. Source used for this record (opens in a new tab)
Pathway source review: checked at stated scope
publisher-description-and-contents: Publisher record and description; full neuroscience claims not independently appraised. A clinical synthesis does not verify every proposed brain mechanism.
checked at stated scope · Recorded date: 2026-10-16
Scope concerns what was consulted; it is not approval of every claim or author endorsement.
Further reading for psychodynamic history, theory and practice.
Access depends on the destination; saving a link does not unlock paid material.