Return to the introductory guide

Groups, development, trauma, culture and sexuality · Chapter 56

Dicks, the Scharffs, Ruszczynski and Morgan: unconscious relationships between people who live together

The complete text is available below. Search, saving resources, and partner-practice tools require JavaScript.

Chapter contents

A change in the object of attention

Individual psychoanalysis asks how a person experiences important others. Couple and family work adds the actual other people and their own accounts. Henry Dicks's marital work and the Tavistock relationship tradition investigated how partners' internal worlds may fit together in persistent arrangements. Nathan Ackerman, James Framo and the Scharffs represent other important routes through psychodynamic family and object-relations practice. They do not comprise a single standardized treatment. [42][248] [248]

In plain English: a relationship can get organized so that one person always carries need and the other always carries distance. Understanding that arrangement is different from deciding that one person simply has the wrong personality.

Shared arrangements and different responsibilities

A couple may maintain an implicit division: one is the sensible organizer, the other the spontaneous one. Each role protects something and limits something. Under stress, the organizer can become controlling and the spontaneous partner unreliable, confirming what each expects. A projective account asks whether each becomes less able to recognize capacities located in the other. It does not mean the partners literally transfer emotions or share equal responsibility for every action.

Actual unequal labor, financial control, coercion and violence cannot be converted into a mutual unconscious bargain. Safety and freedom to speak affect whether conjoint work is appropriate. That assessment is not an administrative preliminary separate from theory; it changes what the relationship can be asked to bear.

Morgan's couple state of mind

Mary Morgan's couple state of mind concerns the clinician's capacity to keep both partners and their relationship in mind, rather than joining one person against the other or becoming trapped in a two-sided contest. Drawing on object relations and the capacity to consider a third position, it helps the therapist think about the relationship as an object of shared inquiry. Stanley Ruszczynski and other Tavistock writers contributed to this clinical tradition. [42]

In plain English: the therapist tries to understand two people and what happens between them without needing one of them to become the winner of the session.

The concept is not a requirement to be blandly impartial. A therapist can recognize an unfair action clearly while remaining interested in both minds. Refusing to decide whether an abusive act occurred is not a sophisticated third position.

Original fictional couple scene

Rosa says, “He never plans anything.” Daniel replies, “There is no point because you redo it.” Each asks the therapist to explain the other.

Therapist: Rosa experiences carrying the planning alone. Daniel experiences his contribution as already disqualified. Could we look at one actual plan before deciding what always happens?

They reconstruct a school trip. Daniel booked transport but did not check the return time. Rosa corrected the booking and then handled the entire trip without telling him what needed doing.

Therapist: There was a real omission. There was also a point where correcting it became taking everything over. What was each of you imagining about the other then?

Rosa: That I cannot depend on him.

Daniel: That she thinks I am another child.

The therapist does not merely reveal the circle. Daniel agrees to take a defined task through to completion; Rosa agrees not to silently take it back. Later they examine what each felt while relying or being relied upon. A practical responsibility and an internal expectation are worked on together.

What makes the intervention psychodynamic: the clinician is interested in how dependency, competence and anticipated humiliation organize the arrangement. The actual task tests whether the formulation increases possibilities. It is not used to prove that both partners are equally at fault.

Adjacent family traditions that matter historically

Murray Bowen's differentiation and triangles, Ivan Boszormenyi-Nagy's attention to intergenerational loyalty and relational ethics, and systemic approaches more broadly changed family practice. They have connections with, departures from and critiques of psychoanalytic thinking. Include them as neighboring developments, not as secretly identical versions of object relations. The same word “triangle” does not mean the same thing in Bowen, Malan and Britton. [288][289][248]

In plain English: three models can all draw a triangle while studying different things: a conflict within a person, a three-person relationship, or the ability to see a relationship from a third position.

A learner should be able to say why a family member is invited, what the treatment unit is and what confidentiality arrangements apply. Bringing relatives into a session without a coherent rationale does not constitute family therapy.

The tradition today

Morgan's 2025 introductory book and a 2026 institute-listed interview provide routes into current couple-analytic thinking. These are reading and listening resources, not evidence that the author endorses this course or that a short scene reproduces her full method. Contemporary practice includes varied couples, cultural arrangements and care networks; the model must not assume that health means one culturally preferred form of heterosexual marriage. [43] [43]

Study task: distinguish three claims in Rosa and Daniel's account: what happened, what each believed it meant, and what the therapist hypothesizes about their arrangement. Propose a change that addresses actual responsibility without making emotional insight a prerequisite for fairness.

Source and reading notes

Independent educational synthesis. Fictional conversations illustrate reasoning. Review scopes describe the material consulted; they do not certify all clinical claims.

  • View in Library

    • Web page, reference, Library or purchase

      A Couple State of Mind: Psychoanalysis of Couples and the Tavistock Relationships Model (opens in a new tab)

      Publisher contents checked

      Publisher description and table of contents reviewed. Chapters were not read.

      Author/publisher description and chapter topics checked, not a full book review.

      Recorded check: 2026-10-16. Source used for this record (opens in a new tab)

      Pathway source review: carried forward

      contents: Author/publisher description and chapter topics checked, not a full book review.

      carried-forward; not independently rechecked in finishing pass · Recorded date: 2026-10-16

      Scope concerns what was consulted; it is not approval of every claim or author endorsement.

      Further reading for psychodynamic history, theory and practice.

      Access depends on the destination; saving a link does not unlock paid material.

  • View in Library

    • Web page, reference, Library or purchase

      Object Relations Family Therapy (opens in a new tab)

      Review scope recorded

      See the pathway review note for the exact material consulted.

      Hardcover identity/description checked. Other format records on the same publisher site show inconsistent 1977 dates; do not adopt those as the original publication date. Full book not read.

      Recorded check: 2026-10-16. Source used for this record (opens in a new tab)

      Pathway source review: checked at stated scope

      publisher-description: Hardcover identity/description checked. Other format records on the same publisher site show inconsistent 1977 dates; do not adopt those as the original publication date. Full book not read.

      checked at stated scope · Recorded date: 2026-10-16

      Scope concerns what was consulted; it is not approval of every claim or author endorsement.

      Further reading for psychodynamic history, theory and practice.

      Access depends on the destination; saving a link does not unlock paid material.

  • View in Library

    • Web page, reference, Library or purchase

      Differentiation of Self (opens in a new tab)

      Review scope recorded

      See the pathway review note for the exact material consulted.

      Model account read. Not evidence that culture can be reduced to a differentiation score.

      Recorded check: 2026-10-16. Source used for this record (opens in a new tab)

      Pathway source review: checked at stated scope

      official-model-description: Model account read. Not evidence that culture can be reduced to a differentiation score.

      checked at stated scope · Recorded date: 2026-10-16

      Scope concerns what was consulted; it is not approval of every claim or author endorsement.

      Further reading for psychodynamic history, theory and practice.

      Access depends on the destination; saving a link does not unlock paid material.

  • View in Library

    • Web page, reference, Library or purchase

      Invisible Loyalties: Reciprocity in Intergenerational Family Therapy (opens in a new tab)

      Review scope recorded

      See the pathway review note for the exact material consulted.

      Reissue record; original 1973 and Spark coauthorship cross-checked in national-library catalog. Full book not read.

      Recorded check: 2026-10-16. Source used for this record (opens in a new tab)

      Pathway source review: checked at stated scope

      publisher-description-and-contents: Reissue record; original 1973 and Spark coauthorship cross-checked in national-library catalog. Full book not read.

      checked at stated scope · Recorded date: 2026-10-16

      Scope concerns what was consulted; it is not approval of every claim or author endorsement.

      Further reading for psychodynamic history, theory and practice.

      Access depends on the destination; saving a link does not unlock paid material.

  • View in Library

    • Web page, reference, Library or purchase

      Mary Morgan interviewed on Off the Couch podcast (opens in a new tab)

      Recording listing checked

      Official page listing the recording reviewed. The recording was not watched.

      March 2026 institutional listing confirms discussion of couple state of mind and 2025 book. Recording not heard.

      Recorded check: 2026-10-16. Source used for this record (opens in a new tab)

      Pathway source review: carried forward

      listing: March 2026 institutional listing confirms discussion of couple state of mind and 2025 book. Recording not heard.

      carried-forward; not independently rechecked in finishing pass · Recorded date: 2026-10-16

      Scope concerns what was consulted; it is not approval of every claim or author endorsement.

      Further reading for psychodynamic history, theory and practice.

      Access depends on the destination; saving a link does not unlock paid material.